Matrix Product States for Modulated Topological Phases: Crystalline Equivalence Principle and Lieb-Schultz-Mattis Constraints
Shang-Qiang Ning, Hiromi Ebisu, Ho Tat Lam

TL;DR
This paper classifies one-dimensional topological phases protected by modulated and spatial symmetries using matrix product states, confirming the crystalline equivalence principle and deriving constraints like Lieb-Schultz-Mattis for such phases.
Contribution
It introduces a classification scheme for modulated symmetry-protected topological phases, linking them to internal SPT phases via the crystalline equivalence principle and spectral sequences.
Findings
Classified modulated SPT phases by cohomology group H^{2}(G,U(1)_s)
Derived a matrix product state proof of the Lyndon-Hochschild-Serre spectral sequence
Proved Lieb-Schultz-Mattis constraints for modulated symmetries and non-invertible reflection symmetries.
Abstract
Modulated symmetries are internal symmetries that act in a spatially non-uniform manner. Consequently, when a modulated symmetry is combined with a spatial symmetry , the total symmetry group takes the form of a semidirect product . Using matrix product states, we classify topological phases protected by modulated symmetries together with spatial symmetries in one spatial dimension. We show that these modulated symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases are classified by , in agreement with the crystalline equivalence principle, which states that SPT phases protected by symmetries involving spatial elements are in one-to-one correspondence with internal SPT phases protected by the same symmetries, viewed as acting internally. Furthermore, we provide a matrix product state derivation of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
