Improving RCT-Based CATE Estimation Under Covariate Mismatch via Calibrated Alignment
Amir Asiaee, Samhita Pal

TL;DR
This paper introduces CALM, a method that aligns observational and RCT data in a shared embedding space to improve CATE estimation despite covariate mismatch, outperforming imputation especially in nonlinear settings.
Contribution
CALM learns a calibrated embedding space that effectively combines RCT and observational data for better heterogeneous treatment effect estimation.
Findings
Calibration-based methods are equivalent for linear CATEs.
Neural embedding variant outperforms in nonlinear regimes.
Embedding alignment outperforms imputation under covariate mismatch.
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects, yet they are often underpowered for detecting effect heterogeneity. Large observational studies (OS) can supplement RCTs for conditional average treatment effect (CATE) estimation, but a key barrier is covariate mismatch: the two sources measure different, only partially overlapping, covariates. We propose CALM (Calibrated ALignment under covariate Mismatch), which bypasses imputation by learning embeddings that map each source's features into a common representation space. OS outcome models are transferred to the RCT embedding space and calibrated using trial data, preserving causal identification from randomization. Finite-sample risk bounds decompose into alignment error, outcome-model complexity, and calibration complexity terms, identifying when embedding alignment outperforms…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
