Why Synchronized Time is a Fiction: Daylight Saving Time, Leap Seconds, and the Guillotine Sharpened for Nothing
Paul Borrill

TL;DR
This paper argues that the concept of a single, synchronized global time is fundamentally flawed due to relativistic and quantum principles, revealing that many time adjustments are mere conventions rather than corrections to an absolute time.
Contribution
It challenges the assumption of absolute global time, linking physical theories to the conceptual foundations of time synchronization practices.
Findings
Relativity prohibits absolute simultaneity.
One-way light speed is conventionally defined.
Experiments show nature admits indefinite causal order.
Abstract
Civilization maintains an elaborate infrastructure devoted to the maintenance of synchronized time. Governments mandate daylight saving time. Standards bodies insert leap seconds into Coordinated Universal Time. Engineers debate leap milliseconds and leap nanoseconds. The Global Positioning System applies relativistic corrections at the nanosecond level. All of these adjustments attempt to preserve an assumption: that a single global time exists and that clocks can be made to agree upon it. This paper argues that this assumption constitutes a category mistake in the sense of Ryle (1949). We show that special and general relativity prohibit absolute simultaneity, that the one-way speed of light is conventionally defined rather than measured, and that recent experiments on indefinite causal order demonstrate nature admits correlations with no well-defined temporal sequence. We trace the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Multidisciplinary Warburg-centric Studies
