A stray light analysis for SO/PHI-HRT and an updated comparison of the inferred magnetic field with SDO/HMI

TL;DR

This study characterizes stray light in SO/PHI-HRT, applies corrections, and compares magnetic field data with SDO/HMI, revealing improved agreement and stronger inferred fields in certain solar features.

Contribution

It provides a detailed stray light analysis and correction method for SO/PHI-HRT, enhancing the accuracy of magnetic field measurements and comparison with SDO/HMI data.

Findings

Stray light correction improves data agreement with SDO/HMI.

Corrected data shows stronger magnetic fields in quiet Sun and active regions.

SO/PHI-HRT infers generally stronger fields than SDO/HMI in most features.

Abstract

Context. The High Resolution Telescope of the Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager on Solar Orbiter (SO/PHI-HRT) operates in an extreme observational environment, observing the Sun as close as $0.28$ au. The high thermal load and large illuminating field puts high demands on the instrument in terms of both imaging performance and false light control. Aims. To characterise the amount of stray light (false light) within SO/PHI-HRT, apply a correction, and re-compare the data products with the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO/HMI). Methods. We analyse solar limb profiles and a Mercury transit to quantify the amount of stray light and add a correction term when partially reconstructing the SO/PHI-HRT images. For the comparison with SDO/HMI we use data from the 2023 March Solar Orbiter inferior conjunction and compare the magnetic fields on a pixel-by-pixel basis. Results. Increased continuum intensity contrast in the quiet Sun, and darker intensity levels are found in strong magnetic features. Consequently, much stronger fields are inferred in these features. Comparing the stray light corrected data with that from the standard SDO/HMI data products results in a much closer agreement across all vector magnetic field components, particularly when the cadence and noise levels are identical. In most solar features, SO/PHI-HRT infers stronger fields than the SDO/HMI line-of-sight magnetograms. Compared to the vector magnetic field from SDO/HMI the two are very well aligned, with only slight differences in the strongest field regions (where $|\mathbf{B}|>1600$ G or $|\mathbf{B_{\text{LOS}}}|>1300$ G).