Beyond the Main Mode: The contribution of access and egress trips in door-to-door travel

TL;DR

This study investigates the full multimodal trip chain, including access and egress, using Dutch travel diary data, revealing how these components influence train travel choices and station accessibility.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive analysis of access and egress trips' impact on train travel, highlighting the importance of station density and transfer disutility in multimodal trip modeling.

Findings

Train and BTM have inherent disutility compared to walking, cycling, or car.

In-vehicle time in train and BTM is perceived as less negative, favoring longer journeys.

Dense station networks promote walking access and egress, reducing transfer disutility.

Abstract

Access and egress trips constitute a substantial part of a train trip in minds of travellers, often being the deciding factor whether to travel by train at all. Despite a host of studies analysing individual legs within a multimodal trip chain, the full chain within a multimodal trip - including access, main and egress - has seen very limited attention. To understand the importance of all these choices, we use travel diaries from the Dutch Mobility Panel to estimate a nested logit discrete choice model. Our results suggest that as a main mode, train and bus/tram/metro (BTM) seem to be associated with an inherent disutility compared to walking, cycling or car. The in-vehicle time in train and BTM, however, seems to be perceived significantly less negatively (60% lower) than in private modes, making them comparatively more attractive for longer journeys. These results imply that, given the strong preference for walking for both access and egress, train stations should be sufficiently dense to allow most people to walk to a station. This, however, should not come at the expense of additional transfers, as they inflict substantial disutility. Operators need to find a balance between accessibility and directness. Given the strong dispreference of travelling by car to dense urban areas, these trips should be the primary target of policymakers and operators for attracting additional travellers to take the train. Future studies could further enhance our understanding of multimodal trips by including additional attributes in the data, account for respondent heterogeneity and study how individuals build their consideration set when making multimodal trips.