Multi-Armed Sequential Hypothesis Testing by Betting
Ricardo J. Sandoval, Ian Waudby-Smith, Michael I. Jordan

TL;DR
This paper develops an optimal sequential testing method for multiple data sources, aiming to efficiently detect at least one effective source while performing nearly as well as an oracle with full knowledge.
Contribution
It introduces a new framework for multi-armed sequential hypothesis testing with optimality guarantees and a novel confidence-bound algorithm for unobservable rewards.
Findings
Established matching lower and upper bounds for performance metrics.
Designed a modified upper-confidence-bound-like algorithm with nonasymptotic concentration inequalities.
Demonstrated the effectiveness of the approach in theoretical analysis.
Abstract
We consider a variant of sequential testing by betting where, at each time step, the statistician is presented with multiple data sources (arms) and obtains data by choosing one of the arms. We consider the composite global null hypothesis that all arms are null in a certain sense (e.g. all dosages of a treatment are ineffective) and we are interested in rejecting in favor of a composite alternative where at least one arm is non-null (e.g. there exists an effective treatment dosage). We posit an optimality desideratum that we describe informally as follows: even if several arms are non-null, we seek -processes and sequential tests whose performance are as strong as the ones that have oracle knowledge about which arm generates the most evidence against . Formally, we generalize notions of log-optimality and expected rejection time…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Bandit Algorithms Research · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Inference
