TL;DR
This paper proposes a novel illumination-aware approach using paired flash and non-flash imaging to improve contactless fingerprint spoof detection, analyzing lighting-induced differences for better robustness.
Contribution
It introduces a paired flash-non-flash acquisition method and interpretable metrics to enhance spoof detection in contactless fingerprint recognition.
Findings
Flash illumination accentuates material-dependent properties.
Differential imaging helps discriminate genuine from spoof fingerprints.
Analysis reveals limitations related to imaging settings and high-fidelity spoofs.
Abstract
Contactless fingerprint recognition enables hygienic and convenient biometric authentication but poses new challenges for spoof detection due to the absence of physical contact and traditional liveness cues. Most existing methods rely on single-image acquisition and appearance-based features, which often generalize poorly across devices, capture conditions, and spoof materials. In this work, we study paired flash-non-flash contactless fingerprint acquisition as a lightweight active sensing mechanism for spoof detection. Through a preliminary empirical analysis, we show that flash illumination accentuates material- and structure-dependent properties, including ridge visibility, subsurface scattering, micro-geometry, and surface oils, while non-flash images provide a baseline appearance context. We analyze lighting-induced differences using interpretable metrics such as inter-channel…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
