Why We Need to Destroy the Illusion of Speaking to A Human: Critical Reflections On Ethics at the Front-End for LLMs
Sarah Diefenbach, Daniel Ullrich

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the ethical implications of designing AI chatbots that mimic human conversation, emphasizing the need to challenge the illusion of speaking to a human to promote ethical AI development.
Contribution
It highlights the ethical challenges of human-like AI interactions and proposes starting points for more ethical front-end AI design to prevent misleading perceptions.
Findings
Chatbots create misleading impressions of human-like understanding.
Designing AI to appear human can activate ethical concerns.
Proposes ethical guidelines for AI interaction design.
Abstract
Conversation with chatbots based on Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT has become one of the major forms of interaction with Artificial Intelligence (AI) in everyday life. What makes this interaction so convenient is that interacting with LLMs feels so natural, and resembles what we know from real, human conversations. At the same time, this seeming similarity is part of one of the ethical challenges of AI design, since it activates many misleading ideas about AI. We discuss similarities and differences between human-AI-conversations and interpersonal conversation and highlight starting points for more ethical design of AI at the front-end.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · AI in Service Interactions · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
