Balance and Fairness through Multicalibration in Nonlife Insurance Pricing
Michel Denuit, Marie Michaelides, Julien Trufin

TL;DR
This paper explores multicalibration in nonlife insurance pricing, aiming to ensure fair and accurate premiums across groups by combining autocalibration with fairness considerations, demonstrated through practical methods and a real case study.
Contribution
It introduces multicalibration as a method to achieve both fairness and autocalibration in insurance pricing, with practical implementation strategies and a case study.
Findings
Multicalibration improves fairness in insurance premiums.
Practical methods include local regression and bias correction.
Case study shows effectiveness in motor insurance data.
Abstract
Autocalibration is known to be an important requirement for insurance premiums since it guarantees that premium income balances corresponding claims, on average, not only at portfolio level but also inside each group paying similar premiums. Also, fairness has become a major concern because unfair treatment may expose insurers to lawsuits or reputational damage. Translating fairness into conditional mean independence allows actuaries to combine autocalibration and fairness into the multicalibration concept. This paper studies the properties of multicalibration in an insurance context and proposes practical ways to implement it, through local regression or bias correction within groups including credibility adjustments. A case study based on motor insurance data illustrates the relevance of multicalibration in insurance pricing.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRisk and Portfolio Optimization · Insurance and Financial Risk Management · Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
