Results of the analysis of a survey for young scientists on training quality in HEP instrumentation software and machine learning
Cecilia Borca, Javier Jim\'enez Pe\~na, David Marckx, Malgorzata Niemiec, Elisabetta Spadaro Norella, Marta Urbaniak (for the ECFA ECR Panel)

TL;DR
This paper analyzes a survey of early-career physicists revealing gaps in training for open-source software and machine learning, aiming to guide improvements in educational programs.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of survey data on training quality and accessibility for young scientists in HEP instrumentation software and machine learning.
Findings
High usage of open-source tools without formal training
Significant lack of training opportunities reported
Survey results to inform training program improvements
Abstract
A 2021 study by the ECFA Early-Career Researchers Panel revealed that 71% of 334 respondents used open-source software tools in their instrumentation work, yet 70% reported receiving no training for these tools. In response, the Software and Machine Learning for Instrumentation group was formed in the ECFA Early-Career Researchers Panel to assess the accessibility and quality of training programs in machine learning and software for early-career researchers in experimental and applied physics. This group launched a new survey, reaching 174 participants. This report summarises the survey results in detail, and is intended to serve as a guiding document to improve the training programs that are available to early-career researchers.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScientific Computing and Data Management · Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research · Computational Physics and Python Applications
