CoMAI: A Collaborative Multi-Agent Framework for Robust and Equitable Interview Evaluation
Gengxin Sun, Ruihao Yu, Liangyi Yin, Yunqi Yang, Bin Zhang, Zhiwei Xu

TL;DR
CoMAI is a multi-agent framework that enhances AI-driven interview evaluation by improving robustness, fairness, and interpretability through modular agents and collaborative assessment strategies.
Contribution
This paper introduces CoMAI, a novel multi-agent system with a modular architecture that outperforms traditional single-agent models in fairness, security, and evaluation accuracy.
Findings
Achieved 90.47% accuracy in assessments
Attained 83.33% recall in candidate evaluation
Secured 84.41% candidate satisfaction
Abstract
Ensuring robust and fair interview assessment remains a key challenge in AI-driven evaluation. This paper presents CoMAI, a general-purpose multi-agent interview framework designed for diverse assessment scenarios. In contrast to monolithic single-agent systems based on large language models (LLMs), CoMAI employs a modular task-decomposition architecture coordinated through a centralized finite-state machine. The system comprises four agents specialized in question generation, security, scoring, and summarization. These agents work collaboratively to provide multi-layered security defenses against prompt injection, support multidimensional evaluation with adaptive difficulty adjustment, and enable rubric-based structured scoring that reduces subjective bias. Experimental results demonstrate that CoMAI achieved 90.47% accuracy, 83.33% recall, and 84.41% candidate satisfaction. These…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Topic Modeling · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
