Analysis of spatially resolved stellar populations and emission line properties in nearby galaxies with J-PLUS data. II-Results for the M51 group and first comparison with the M101 group
J. Thain\'a-Batista, R. Cid Fernandes, R. M. Gonz\'alez Delgado, J. E. Rodr\'iguez-Mart\'in, R. Garc\'ia-Benito, L. A. D\'iaz-Garc\'ia, G. Mart\'inez-Solaeche, D. Ruschel-Dutra, V. H. Sasse, A. J. Cenarro, D. Crist\'obal-Hornillos, C. Hern\'andez-Monteagudo, C. L\'opez-Sanjuan

TL;DR
This study uses J-PLUS survey data to analyze spatially resolved stellar populations and emission lines in nearby galaxy groups, revealing environmental effects on galaxy evolution and demonstrating the survey's potential for detailed galaxy analysis.
Contribution
It applies a consistent methodology to the M51 group, compares it with the M101 group, and highlights the impact of environment and interactions on galaxy properties.
Findings
M51a shows active star-forming spiral arms, M51b is a retired galaxy.
M63 exhibits asymmetries indicating outside-in quenching.
M51 group shows signs of advanced dynamical evolution.
Abstract
We characterize the spatially resolved stellar population and emission-line properties of galaxies in the M51 group using the same methodology previously applied to the M101 group, aiming to understand how environmental processes shape galaxy properties across different groups. Properties are derived by applying the \textsc{AlStar} spectral fitting code to multi-band datacubes from the Javalambre Photometric Local Universe Survey (J-PLUS). We present spatially resolved maps of the main stellar population and emission-line properties for the M51 group galaxies. The interacting pair M51a/b displays clearly distinct properties: M51a shows prominent star-forming spiral arms, while its companion is essentially an early-type retired galaxy. M63 exhibits asymmetries in stellar age, dust attenuation, and H equivalent width, consistent with outside-in quenching likely related to a past…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
