Flood Risk Follows Valleys, Not Grids: Graph Neural Networks for Flash Flood Susceptibility Mapping in Himachal Pradesh with Conformal Uncertainty Quantification

TL;DR

This study introduces a graph neural network approach for flash flood susceptibility mapping in Himachal Pradesh, leveraging watershed connectivity to improve prediction accuracy and providing statistically guaranteed uncertainty intervals.

Contribution

It presents the first application of GNNs with conformal uncertainty quantification for flood risk mapping, outperforming pixel-based models by incorporating upstream connectivity.

Findings

GNN achieved AUC = 0.978, outperforming baselines.

Connectivity improves predictive performance.

Conformal prediction provided 82.9% coverage with some limitations.

Abstract

Flash floods are the most destructive natural hazard in Himachal Pradesh (HP), India, causing over 400 fatalities and $1.2 billion in losses in the 2023 monsoon season alone. Existing risk maps treat every pixel independently, ignoring the basic fact that flooding upstream raises risk downstream. We address this with a Graph Neural Network (GraphSAGE) trained on a watershed connectivity graph (460 sub-watersheds, 1,700 directed edges), built from a six-year Sentinel-1 SAR flood inventory (2018-2023, 3,000 events) and 12 environmental variables at 30 m resolution. Four pixel-based ML models (RF, XGBoost, LightGBM, stacking ensemble) serve as baselines. All models are evaluated with leave-one-basin-out spatial cross-validation to avoid the 5-15% AUC inflation of random splits. Conformal prediction produces the first HP susceptibility maps with statistically guaranteed 90% coverage intervals. The GNN achieved AUC = 0.978 +/- 0.017, outperforming the best baseline (AUC = 0.881) and the published HP benchmark (AUC = 0.88). The +0.097 gain confirms that river connectivity carries predictive signal that pixel-based models miss. High-susceptibility zones overlap 1,457 km of highways (including 217 km of the Manali-Leh corridor), 2,759 bridges, and 4 major hydroelectric installations. Conformal intervals achieved 82.9% empirical coverage on the held-out 2023 test set; lower coverage in high-risk zones (45-59%) points to SAR label noise as a target for future work.