Infinite families of APN permutations in constrained trivariate classes over $\mathbb{F}_{2^m}$

TL;DR

This paper extends two APN permutation families over finite fields by allowing scalar parameters to vary, providing new infinite, mutually inequivalent APN permutation families with specific algebraic and equivalence properties.

Contribution

It introduces two new parametric families of APN permutations over _{2^m} with explicit root-based permutation criteria and proves their inequivalence to existing families.

Findings

At least _{2^m}+1-(d-1)(d-2)2^{m/2}-d values of a produce APN permutations.

The polynomial criterion for permutation and APN property is established and shown to be equivalent.

The two families are mutually inequivalent and distinct from previously known APN permutations.

Abstract

We study trivariate permutation polynomials over $\mathbb{F}_{2^{m}}$ extending two APN permutation families of Li--Kaleyski (IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 2024) by allowing the scalar parameter to vary over $\mathbb{F}_{2^m}^*$. For \[ G_a(x,y,z)=(x^{q+1}+ax^qz+yz^q,\; x^qz+y^{q+1},\; xy^q+ay^qz+z^{q+1}), \] where $a\in\mathbb{F}_{2^m}^*$, $q=2^i$, $\gcd(i,m)=1$, and $m$ is odd, we prove that $G_a$ is a permutation if and only if an associated univariate polynomial has no root in $\mathbb{F}_{2^m}^*$, and that this condition is also equivalent to $G_a$ being APN. Hence, writing $d=q^2+q+1$, at least \[ \frac{2^m+1-(d-1)(d-2)2^{m/2}-d}{d} \] values of $a$ yield APN permutations $G_a$. In the binary case $q=2$, we show that $a=1$ is good whenever $7\nmid m$, recovering the Li--Kaleyski family. For the second family \[ H_a(x,y,z)=(x^{q+1}+axy^q+yz^q,\; xy^q+z^{q+1},\; x^qz+y^{q+1}+ay^qz), \] we obtain the same root criterion and prove that its defining polynomial is root-equivalent to that of $G_a$. Thus the same parameters $a$ give APN permutations in both families. We also prove strong inequivalence results. First, $G_a$ (resp.\ $H_a$) is diagonally equivalent to $G_1$ (resp.\ $H_1$) if and only if $a^{q^2+q+1}=1$; moreover, for $m>4$, $m\neq 6$, and $7\nmid m$, diagonal non-equivalence implies CCZ non-equivalence by the monomial restriction theorem of Shi et al.\ (DCC, 2025). In particular, when $q=2$ and $7\nmid m$, every good $a\neq 1$ gives APN permutations CCZ-inequivalent to Li--Kaleyski. Second, for the same range of $m$, no $G_a$ is CCZ-equivalent to any $H_b$. Hence these constructions yield two genuinely new, mutually inequivalent families of APN permutations on $\mathbb{F}_{2^{3m}}$.