CIV wind properties of the SDSS-V X-ray selected quasars: strong optical-to-UV emission is key regardless of X-ray strength
Amy L. Rankine, David Homan, James Aird, Pranavi Hiremath, Scott F. Anderson, Roberto J. Assef, Franz E. Bauer, W. N. Brandt, Marcella Brusa, Johannes Buchner, Maria Chira, Yaherlyn D\'iaz, Patrick B. Hall, Anton M. Koekemoer, Mirko Krumpe, Georg Lamer, Teng Liu, Sean Morrison

TL;DR
This study investigates the optical/UV and X-ray properties of over 3000 X-ray selected quasars at redshifts 1.5 to 3.5, revealing that optical-to-UV emission slopes are key to understanding accretion disc winds, regardless of X-ray strength.
Contribution
It demonstrates that optical-to-UV spectral slopes correlate more strongly with wind strength than X-ray properties, supporting a radiation line-driven wind model.
Findings
X-ray spectral properties are not strongly correlated with wind strength.
Optical-to-UV spectral slope ($\alpha_{ouv}$) correlates with wind strength more than $\alpha_{ox}$.
X-ray selected quasars show lower CIV blueshifts and higher equivalent widths than optically selected samples.
Abstract
We present an investigation of the rest-frame optical/UV and X-ray properties for a sample of 3027 X-ray selected quasars between detected in the deepest Spectrum Roentgen Gamma/eROSITA data available and observed by the fifth iteration of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-V). We parametrize the CIV emission line to infer the strength of accretion disc winds and perform X-ray spectral fitting. The X-ray spectral properties -- namely, the 2keV monochromatic luminosity (L) and spectral slope -- are not strongly correlated with wind strength. Despite this result, the X-ray selected sample is shifted towards lower CIV blueshifts and higher equivalent widths than the optically selected sample observed in previous SDSS surveys, and matching in optical luminosity, redshift, and Eddington ratio does not reduce these differences. We estimate the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
