Machine learning for sustainable geoenergy: uncertainty, physics and decision-ready inference

TL;DR

This paper discusses how machine learning can improve decision-making in geoenergy projects by addressing uncertainties, physical constraints, and multi-objective trade-offs, with a focus on practical applications and standards.

Contribution

It proposes ML approaches tailored for geoenergy challenges, emphasizing uncertainty quantification, hybrid models, and multi-fidelity learning, and outlines a pragmatic agenda for standards and validation.

Findings

ML approaches enable better risk assessment in geoenergy.

Probabilistic UQ improves decision confidence.

Structured ML models enhance monitoring and basin management.

Abstract

Geoenergy projects (CO2 storage, geothermal, subsurface H2 generation/storage, critical minerals from subsurface fluids, or nuclear waste disposal) increasingly follow a petroleum-style funnel from screening and appraisal to operations, monitoring, and stewardship. Across this funnel, limited and heterogeneous observations must be turned into risk-bounded operational choices under strong physical and geological constraints - choices that control deployment rate, cost of capital, and the credibility of climate-mitigation claims. These choices are inherently multi-objective, balancing performance against containment, pressure footprint, induced seismicity, energy/water intensity, and long-term stewardship. We argue that progress is limited by four recurring bottlenecks: (i) scarce, biased labels and few field performance outcomes; (ii) uncertainty treated as an afterthought rather than the deliverable; (iii) weak scale-bridging from pore to basin (including coupled chemical-flow-geomechanics); and (iv) insufficient quality assurance (QA), auditability, and governance for regulator-facing deployment. We outline machine learning (ML) approaches that match these realities (hybrid physics-ML, probabilistic uncertainty quantification (UQ), structure-aware representations, and multi-fidelity/continual learning) and connect them to four anchor applications: imaging-to-process digital twins, multiphase flow and near-well conformance, monitoring and inverse problems (monitoring, measurement, and verification (MMV), including deformation and microseismicity), and basin-scale portfolio management. We close with a pragmatic agenda for benchmarks, validation, reporting standards, and policy support needed for reproducible and defensible ML in sustainable geoenergy.