The Optimizer Quotient and the Certification Trilemma
Tristan Simas

TL;DR
This paper introduces the optimizer quotient as a key decision-relevant abstraction and proves an impossibility trilemma for its exact certification under standard complexity assumptions.
Contribution
It establishes a fundamental impossibility result for certifying the optimizer quotient's structure, highlighting complexity barriers and conditions for polynomial-time certification.
Findings
Exact certification of the optimizer quotient faces an impossibility trilemma.
Complexity of certification varies across different regimes, from coNP to PSPACE.
Mechanization of the core in Lean 4 demonstrates practical verification approaches.
Abstract
The optimizer quotient is the canonical object for exact decision-relevant information: it is the coarsest exact decision-preserving abstraction (Theorem 2.15). This paper proves that exact certification of this object's coordinate structure is subject to an impossibility trilemma: under , no certifier can be simultaneously sound, complete on all in-scope instances, and polynomial-budgeted (Theorem 7.1). The cost of this impossibility varies by regime: coNP (static), PP-hard (stochastic decisiveness), PSPACE-complete (sequential). Six structural restrictions collapse certification to polynomial time. The finite reduction and verification core is mechanized in Lean 4.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
