A modest change in magnetic braking at the fully convective boundary explains cataclysmic variable evolution
Joaqu\'in A. Barraza-Jorquera, Matthias R. Schreiber, Stuart Littlefair, Diogo Belloni, Axel D. Schwope

TL;DR
This study updates magnetic braking models in CV evolution, showing a moderate decrease in braking efficiency at the fully convective boundary can explain observed orbital period distributions.
Contribution
It introduces a revised saturated magnetic braking prescription with boosting and disruption parameters, improving CV evolution modeling accuracy.
Findings
Moderate disruption factor of 2-3 suffices to match observations.
Magnetic braking needs to be stronger in close binaries than in single stars.
Small decrease in braking efficiency impacts dynamo models for stars.
Abstract
Context. For decades, reproducing the orbital period distribution of non-magnetic Cataclysmic Variables (CVs) seemed to require a drastic decrease, usually termed disruption, of angular momentum loss through magnetic braking at the fully convective boundary, which argued for a change in the dynamo mechanism operating in fully and partially convective stars. However, recent studies showed that the magnetic braking prescription traditionally used in CV evolution theory is clearly outdated as saturation, that is, a weak period dependence for rapidly rotating stars, is not included. Aims. Here we test an updated version of a saturated magnetic braking prescription that has been developed to explain the spin-down of single stars in the context of CV evolution. This prescription contains a boosting and a disruption parameter that represent the change in the strength of magnetic braking at the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
