Adaptive quantum metrology with large dynamic range using short one-axis twists

TL;DR

This paper proposes a feasible adaptive quantum phase estimation protocol using short one-axis twist operations, achieving large dynamic range and near-Heisenberg scaling, with robustness to experimental imperfections.

Contribution

It introduces a practical scheme combining OAT operations and rotations for enhanced quantum phase estimation with large dynamic range.

Findings

Achieves phase estimation with near-Heisenberg scaling.

Demonstrates protocol robustness against experimental imperfections.

Provides explicit OAT-based protocols with polynomially decreasing durations.

Abstract

Phase estimation with potentially large phase values, i.e., with large dynamic range, has many applications in quantum metrology, for example to atomic clocks. A recently proposed phase estimation scheme approaches the Heisenberg scaling in this global setting using sequences of increasingly squeezed Gaussian states as probes and adaptively chosen, potentially mid-circuit, measurements. In this work, we first observe that the pattern of increase in the squeezing of the probes is applicable even to states with some non-Gaussian features. We then propose an experimentally feasible version of this phase estimation scheme, based on the alternating application of one-axis twist (OAT) operations and rotations. Our protocols are explicitly described in terms of multiple OAT angles whose durations decrease polynomially with system size and spin-squeezing parameters that decay as $N^{-\mu}$, with $\mu>2/3$ in most cases. Using numerical computation of the system-size dependence $N^{-\nu}$ of the Bayesian mean-squared error of an estimator, we show that these states are suitable for use in the phase estimation scheme, and highlight the protocols to achieve $\nu=17/9$ and $53/27$ using two and three OAT operations respectively in the last adaptation stage. We also analyze the limited non-Gaussianity of the resulting probe states and discuss the role of non-Gaussianity in this protocol more generally. Finally, we analyze how robust these protocols are with respect to imperfections such as particle number fluctuations and coherent control fluctuations.