Single-Event Multinomial Full Kelly via Implicit State Positions
Christopher D. Long

TL;DR
This paper presents a simplified derivation of the full Kelly betting strategy for a single event with multiple outcomes, using an implicit state-position perspective that streamlines the solution process.
Contribution
It introduces an implicit position framework that simplifies the derivation and understanding of the Kelly optimal stakes for finitely many outcomes.
Findings
Provides a compact proof of the Kelly formula using implicit state positions.
Introduces a greedy algorithm for support selection based on outcome ratios.
Clarifies the role of baseline cash positions in Kelly betting strategies.
Abstract
For a single event with finitely many mutually exclusive outcomes, the full Kelly problem is to maximize expected log wealth over nonnegative stakes together with an optional cash position. The optimal formula is classical, but the support-selection step is often presented via Lagrange multipliers. This note gives a shorter state-price derivation. A cash fraction acts as an implicit position in every outcome: in terminal-wealth terms, it is equivalent to a baseline stake on outcome , where is the state price. On any active support, explicit bets therefore only top up favorable outcomes from this baseline to the optimal total stake . This yields the formula , the threshold rule , and, after sorting outcomes by , a one-pass greedy algorithm for support selection. The result is standard in substance, but the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRisk and Portfolio Optimization · Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research · Probability and Risk Models
