Real-World AI Evaluation: How FRAME Generates Systematic Evidence to Resolve the Decision-Maker's Dilemma
Reva Schwartz, Gabriella Waters

TL;DR
FRAME is a systematic approach combining large-scale trials and contextual observation to evaluate AI systems in real-world settings, addressing the limitations of traditional model-centric metrics.
Contribution
The paper introduces FRAME, a novel framework that integrates large-scale testing and contextual analysis to provide dependable, actionable evidence of AI behavior in practice.
Findings
FRAME enables detailed understanding of AI behavior across diverse real-world contexts.
It combines scalable testing with contextual observation for comprehensive evaluation.
The approach reveals how AI outcomes vary and where risks and benefits accumulate.
Abstract
Organizational leaders are being asked to make high-stakes decisions about AI deployment without dependable evidence of what these systems actually do in the environments they oversee. The predominant AI evaluation ecosystem yields scalable but abstract metrics that reflect the priorities of model development. By smoothing over the heterogeneity of real-world use, these model-centric approaches obscure how behavior varies across users, workflows, and settings, and rarely show where risk and value accumulate in practice. More user-centric studies reveal rich contextual detail, yet are fragmented, small-scale and loosely coupled to the mechanisms that shape model behavior. The Forum for Real-World AI Measurement and Evaluation (FRAME) aims to address this gap by combining large-scale trials of AI systems with structured observation of how they are used in context, the outcomes they…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
