Generative Horcrux: Designing AI Carriers for Afterlife Selves
Zhen-Chi Lai, Yu-Ting Cheng, Pei-Ying Lin, Chiao-Wei Ho, Janet Yi-Ching Huang

TL;DR
This paper explores the design and conceptualization of AI agents as digital legacies or 'Generative Horcruxes' that preserve memory and identity after death, using fiction and prototyping to foster interdisciplinary dialogue.
Contribution
It introduces a novel conceptual framework for AI agents as vessels of digital legacy, combining design, ethics, and speculative prototyping.
Findings
Stimulates interdisciplinary discussion on digital afterlife
Proposes new design concepts for AI-based legacy preservation
Highlights ethical considerations in posthumous AI representations
Abstract
As generative AI technologies rapidly advance, AI agents are gaining the ability not only to collect data and perform tasks but also to respond to environments and evolve over time. This shift opens new possibilities for reimagining digital legacy - raising critical questions about how we remember, commemorate, and interact with the traces of the deceased. The forms of these AI agents are particularly important, as they act as vessels for digital legacies - much like urns for ashes. We will ask: What kinds of devices or representations would we want to store our digital selves or legacies in? How do we envision future generations interacting with these forms? The question is not only about the function of these agents or the object's role as a storage vessel but also the meaning it carries, the memories it preserves, and its connection to the extended notion of our "Generative Horcrux."…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
