Array Geometry-Centric Axial Sidelobe Interference Analysis for Near-Field Multi-User MIMO
Ahmed Hussain, Asmaa Abdallah, Abdulkadir Celik, Ahmed M. Eltawil

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how array geometry affects axial sidelobe interference in near-field multi-user MIMO systems, deriving formulas and comparing array types to optimize interference suppression and data rates.
Contribution
It provides the first closed-form expressions for axial sidelobes in near-field MU-MIMO and compares different array geometries to identify the optimal design for interference mitigation.
Findings
Uniform square arrays have the lowest axial sidelobes.
USA achieves a peak sidelobe level of -17.6 dB.
Numerical results show USA outperforms other arrays in sidelobe suppression and sumrate.
Abstract
With the deployment of large antenna arrays at high-frequency bands, future wireless communication systems are likely to operate in the radiative near-field (NF). Unlike far-field beam steering, NF beams can be focused on a spatial region with finite depth, enabling user multiplexing in both range and angle. In NF multiuser multiple-input multiple-output (MU-MIMO) systems, achievable rates are limited by interference arising from sidelobes in both the axial (range) and lateral (angle) dimensions. This work investigates how axial sidelobes (ASLs) vary with array geometry. Closed-form array gain expressions are derived to characterize ASLs for uniform planar arrays. Analytical results show that the uniform square array (USA) yields the lowest ASLs, followed by the uniform concentric circular array (UCCA), uniform linear array (ULA), and uniform circular array (UCA). Specifically, the USA…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAntenna Design and Optimization · Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology · Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
