Last-iterate Convergence of ADMM on Multi-affine Quadratic Equality Constrained Problem
Yutong Chao, Michal Ciebielski, Jalal Etesami, Majid Khadiv

TL;DR
This paper proves that ADMM converges for a specific class of non-convex quadratic problems with multi-affine constraints, with linear convergence under certain conditions, and validates results through robotic applications.
Contribution
It establishes convergence and linear convergence rates of ADMM for multi-affine quadratic equality constrained problems, a class with practical relevance.
Findings
ADMM converges under mild assumptions for these problems.
Linear convergence is achieved when non-convexity is bounded.
Practical validation in robotic locomotion demonstrates applicability.
Abstract
In this paper, we study a class of non-convex optimization problems known as multi-affine quadratic equality constrained problems, which appear in various applications--from generating feasible force trajectories in robotic locomotion and manipulation to training neural networks. Although these problems are generally non-convex, they exhibit convexity or related properties when all variables except one are fixed. Under mild assumptions, we prove that the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) converges when applied to this class of problems. Furthermore, when the "degree" of non-convexity in the constraints remains within certain bounds, we show that ADMM achieves a linear convergence rate. We validate our theoretical results through practical examples in robotic locomotion.
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
The paper tackles an important and non-trivial problem: designing solvers with convergence guarantees for non-convex problems, with many applications. The paper is well-written throughout. Assumptions and results are clearly stated, discussed, and compared to other ones in the literature, which makes the contribution clear. Examples are instructive and show the necessity of assumptions. The ADMM scheme is tested on a non-trivial locomotion problem, and results validate the derived convergence ra
The following limitations and suggestions are minor: 1) Application to locomotion: The proposed method can only handle the case with pre-defined contact sequences and timings. This limitation should be stated. 2) Section 5, baselines: - Adding a sentence describing the baselines and their difference with the proposed ADMM scheme would strengthen the comparison. - Computation times for solving the locomotion problem are not reported. It is unclear if the proposed method is faster and converges
The results obtained appear to be new: in particular, the convergence of ADMM under certain assumptions was proven in Guo et al. (2020) but without a convergence rate analysis. The simulation experiments with robots are limited but rather convincing. I am not an optimization specialist, but the paper is interesting and well written, and a cursory look at the proofs indicates that they are reasonable (e.g., they go further than noting that the sequences are decreasing and bounded below, or that
Although the robotic experiments validate the assumptions made in the paper, it would be nice to discuss these further, for example Assumption 2.3 on the objective function, which seems rather restrictive, as well as their importance in practice.
- This paper clearly demonstrates the real-world applicability of centroidal dynamics in locomotion by highlighting how they give rise to multi-affine quadratic constraints. - It provides comprehensive theoretical results and several meaningful extensions. - The analysis makes novel contributions by establishing explicit conditions for linear convergence when nonlinear constraint coefficients are sufficiently small in relation to linear components.
The author needs to make a major revision to improve the quality. Some detailed comments are provided below. - Although multi-affine quadratic constraints are generally challenging, the problem becomes affine when all but one variable block is fixed. ADMM can naturally exploit this structure, which appears to have a negligible effect on the analysis framework of classic ADMM. The convergence rate (Theorem 3.1) also basically follow the convergence analysis in [1] and the KL framework in [2]. (H
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems · Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics · Robot Manipulation and Learning
