Prediction of Grade, Gender, and Academic Performance of Children and Teenagers from Handwriting Using the Sigma-Lognormal Model
Adrian Iste, Kazuki Nishizawa, Chisa Tanaka, Andrew Vargo, Anna Scius-Bertrand, Andreas Fischer, Koichi Kise

TL;DR
This study investigates how detailed handwriting dynamics can predict student characteristics like grade, gender, and academic performance, revealing developmental and individual differences in children's motor organization.
Contribution
It compares different handwriting-derived features and demonstrates their effectiveness in predicting student attributes, highlighting the developmental insights from handwriting analysis.
Findings
Handwriting features can predict grade with high accuracy.
Handwriting dynamics encode gender and performance information.
Children's handwriting evolves toward a lognormal motor organization.
Abstract
Digital handwriting acquisition enables the capture of detailed temporal and kinematic signals reflecting the motor processes underlying writing behavior. While handwriting analysis has been extensively explored in clinical or adult populations, its potential for studying developmental and educational characteristics in children remains less investigated. In this work, we examine whether handwriting dynamics encode information related to student characteristics using a large-scale online dataset collected from Japanese students from elementary school to junior high school. We systematically compare three families of handwriting-derived features: basic statistical descriptors of kinematic signals, entropy-based measures of variability, and parameters obtained from the sigma-lognormal model. Although the dataset contains dense stroke-level recordings, features are aggregated at the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
