AGN obscuration in optical and X-rays: Host properties and the interplay of nuclear and galactic gas and dust in a combined SDSS-XMM sample
G. Mountrichas, F.J. Carrera, E. Quintin, A. Viitanen, A. Corral, N. Webb

TL;DR
This study explores the relationship between optical obscuration and X-ray absorption in AGN, revealing that obscuration is influenced by multi-scale gas and dust distributions, not just orientation.
Contribution
It combines X-ray spectroscopy and host-galaxy analysis to identify mismatched AGN populations, advancing understanding of obscuration mechanisms.
Findings
70% of AGN show consistent optical and X-ray obscuration classifications.
Identified populations with dust-free or host-scale X-ray absorbers.
Host properties differ significantly between obscured and unobscured AGN.
Abstract
We investigate the link between optical obscuration and X-ray absorption in active galactic nuclei (AGN) by combining X-ray spectroscopy from 4XMM-DR11 with SDSS DR16Q spectroscopy. Bayesian X-ray spectral fits were obtained within the XMM2Athena project, and host-galaxy properties were derived via \textsc{CIGALE} SED fitting. Our final sample comprises 241 X-ray AGN at . For 172 sources (), the optical broad-line (BL) or narrow-line (NL) classification agrees with their X-ray obscuration based on , but two mismatched populations emerge. Eleven BL AGN show signs of X-ray absorption (BLAbs) and elevated gas-to-dust ratios compared to BL AGN, consistent with dust-free or host-scale absorbers. Conversely, 58 NL AGN appear unobscured in X-rays (NLUnabs) and low gas-to-dust ratios. Nearly half are assigned type~1 properties by SED fitting, suggesting diluted or…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
