Macroscopic Dominance from Microscopic Extremes: Symmetry Breaking in Spatial Competition
Stuti Guha, Shawn D. Ryan, Bhargav R. Karamched

TL;DR
This paper presents a stochastic model of spatial competition showing how initial microscopic advantages, governed by extreme value statistics, influence macroscopic dominance, but require non-reciprocal interactions to stabilize long-term advantage.
Contribution
It introduces a novel stochastic model that decouples discovery and monopolization phases, highlighting the role of extreme value statistics and non-reciprocal interactions in spatial competition.
Findings
Initial advantage depends exponentially on population size
Transient superiority alone cannot ensure dominance
Non-reciprocal interactions are essential for stable dominance
Abstract
How do competing populations convert a spatial advantage into macroscopic dominance? We introduce a stochastic model for resource competition that decouples the transient discovery phase from monopolization. Initial symmetry breaking is governed by extreme value statistics of first-passage times: a linear spatial disadvantage requires an exponentially larger population to overcome. However, transient superiority cannot stabilize dominance. A non-reciprocal interaction bias is strictly necessary to arrest local fluctuations and drive the system into a robust absorbing state.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Game Theory and Applications · Diffusion and Search Dynamics
