On the dual nature of atmospheric escape

TL;DR

This paper reveals that atmospheric escape involves a smooth transition between collisional hydrodynamic flow and collisionless ballistic particles, challenging the traditional binary classification and offering a unified model.

Contribution

It introduces a two-channel framework that unifies hydrodynamic and kinetic descriptions of atmospheric escape, advancing beyond classical dichotomous models.

Findings

Collisionless particles influence the flow at all altitudes.

Flow profiles resemble Parker breeze solutions.

Escape involves a gradual shift from collisional to collisionless behavior.

Abstract

Planetary atmospheres cannot remain hydrostatic at all altitudes because they approach finite density at infinite radius, implying infinite mass. Classical treatments address this in two directions: either retain a hydrostatic structure while allowing particles in the high-velocity tail to decouple and escape in a Jeans-type manner, or promote the gas to a continuum outflow to obtain a transonic Parker-type solution. The usual criterion compares the local mean free path to the sonic point radius. If the mean free path is shorter, the atmosphere is hydrostatic with an imposed Jeans escape flux; if it is longer, the gas is hydrodynamic with Jeans escape neglected. Here, we show that hydrogen-rich atmospheres do not separate cleanly into hydrodynamic and Jeans-escape regimes. At any radius, some particles still collide and behave as a fluid, while others have already experienced their last collision and move collisionlessly on ballistic trajectories. The relative importance of these two behaviors changes smoothly with radius rather than switching at a single boundary. The hydrodynamic channel accelerates and passes through a sonic point, whereas the collisionless channel decelerates under gravity and grows with altitude, removing mass and momentum from the collisional flow. As the collisionless component grows, the bulk flow speed reaches a maximum and then decelerates thereafter, producing profiles similar to Parker breeze solutions even though escape is carried by the collisionless channel. This two-channel framework provides a first step toward a self-consistent treatment that unifies hydrodynamics and kinetics in atmospheric loss models.