Uncertainty-Aware Deep Hedging
Manan Poddar (Department of Mathematics, London School of Economics)

TL;DR
This paper enhances deep hedging by integrating uncertainty quantification through ensemble methods, enabling confidence-based strategy blending that significantly improves hedging performance over classical models.
Contribution
It introduces a novel uncertainty quantification approach for deep hedging using ensemble disagreement, improving hedge strategy robustness and performance.
Findings
Ensemble disagreement predicts hedging success accurately.
Blending strategies based on uncertainty outperform classical models.
Uncertainty is mainly driven by option moneyness, not volatility.
Abstract
Deep hedging trains neural networks to manage derivative risk under market frictions, but produces hedge ratios with no measure of model confidence -- a significant barrier to deployment. We introduce uncertainty quantification to the deep hedging framework by training a deep ensemble of five independent LSTM networks under Heston stochastic volatility with proportional transaction costs. The ensemble's disagreement at each time step provides a per-time-step confidence measure that is strongly predictive of hedging performance: the learned strategy outperforms the Black-Scholes delta on approximately 80% of paths when model agreement is high, but on fewer than 20% when disagreement is elevated. We propose a CVaR-optimised blending strategy that combines the ensemble's hedge with the classical Black-Scholes delta, weighted by the level of model uncertainty. The blend improves on the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRisk and Portfolio Optimization · Stock Market Forecasting Methods · Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
