On Risk Aversion in Auctions
Marilyn Pease, Mark Whitmeyer

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how risk aversion influences bidding strategies in auctions, revealing that increased risk aversion leads to higher bids in first-price auctions and lower bids in second-price auctions under certain conditions.
Contribution
It provides a unified framework to understand the impact of risk aversion on bidding behavior across different auction formats.
Findings
Greater risk aversion increases bids in first-price auctions under specific payoff conditions.
In second-price auctions, higher risk aversion leads to lower bids when outside options are known.
Theoretical equilibrium comparisons confirm the bid-level effects of risk aversion.
Abstract
We provide a unifying way to analyze how risk aversion changes bidding in auctions by asking which bids become more attractive as bidders become more risk averse. In first-price auctions, under two payoff conditions--winning is never worse than the outside option, and winning with a low bid is preferable to winning only with a high bid--greater risk aversion makes high bids more appealing. In second-price auctions with a known outside option, bidding more increases risk exposure conditional on winning, so greater risk aversion favors lower bids. We show these bid-level forces translate into corresponding equilibrium comparative statics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAuction Theory and Applications · Economic Policies and Impacts · Game Theory and Applications
