No evaluation without fair representation : Impact of label and selection bias on the evaluation, performance and mitigation of classification models

TL;DR

This paper empirically studies how label and selection biases affect the evaluation, performance, and mitigation of classification models, introducing a framework to model and analyze biased datasets for fairer assessment.

Contribution

It introduces a biasing and evaluation framework to model fair and biased worlds, enabling controlled analysis of bias impacts on model evaluation and mitigation methods.

Findings

Bias type influences model performance impact.

No trade-off between fairness and accuracy on unbiased test sets.

Bias mitigation effectiveness varies with bias type.

Abstract

Bias can be introduced in diverse ways in machine learning datasets, for example via selection or label bias. Although these bias types in themselves have an influence on important aspects of fair machine learning, their different impact has been understudied. In this work, we empirically analyze the effect of label bias and several subtypes of selection bias on the evaluation of classification models, on their performance, and on the effectiveness of bias mitigation methods. We also introduce a biasing and evaluation framework that allows to model fair worlds and their biased counterparts through the introduction of controlled bias in real-life datasets with low discrimination. Using our framework, we empirically analyze the impact of each bias type independently, while obtaining a more representative evaluation of models and mitigation methods than with the traditional use of a subset of biased data as test set. Our results highlight different factors that influence how impactful bias is on model performance. They also show an absence of trade-off between fairness and accuracy, and between individual and group fairness, when models are evaluated on a test set that does not exhibit unwanted bias. They furthermore indicate that the performance of bias mitigation methods is influenced by the type of bias present in the data. Our findings call for future work to develop more accurate evaluations of prediction models and fairness interventions, but also to better understand other types of bias, more complex scenarios involving the combination of different bias types, and other factors that impact the efficiency of the mitigation methods, such as dataset characteristics.