Safe or Slow? The Illusion of Thermal Stability Under Reduced-Velocity Nail Intrusion
Eymen Ipek, Oliver Korak, Georg Gsellmann, Andrey Golubkov

TL;DR
This paper explores how the speed of nail penetration affects the thermal stability of lithium-ion pouch cells, revealing that slower speeds do not cause thermal runaway but lead to self-discharge, impacting safety testing protocols.
Contribution
It demonstrates that nail penetration speed influences thermal runaway onset, offering new insights for safer battery design and testing procedures.
Findings
Lower speeds do not induce thermal runaway
Cells exhibit self-discharge with embedded nails
Penetration speed is critical for safety assessments
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of nail penetration speed on the safety outcomes of large-format automotive lithium-ion pouch cells. Through six controlled tests varying the speed of nail insertion, we observed that lower penetration speeds did not induce thermal runaway; instead, the cells exhibited self-discharge while the nail remained embedded. These findings suggest that penetration speed is a critical factor in the onset of thermal runaway, providing valuable insights for the development of safer battery systems and more effective safety testing protocols.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Electrostatic Discharge in Electronics
