Slippage-at-Risk (SaR): A Forward-Looking Liquidity Risk Framework for Perpetual Futures Exchanges
Otar Sepper

TL;DR
This paper introduces Slippage-at-Risk (SaR), a forward-looking liquidity risk framework for perpetual futures exchanges that assesses liquidation risk based on current order book microstructure, improving systemic stress prediction.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel forward-looking liquidity risk metric, SaR, with three complementary measures and a concentration adjustment, linking it to optimal capital requirements and systemic risk prediction.
Findings
SaR effectively predicts systemic stress events.
Empirical validation on Hyperliquid data shows SaR's predictive power.
SaR outperforms traditional backward-looking metrics in stress forecasting.
Abstract
We introduce , a quantitative framework for measuring liquidity risk in perpetual futures exchanges. Unlike backward-looking metrics such as Value-at-Risk computed on historical returns or realized deficit distributions, SaR provides a \emph{forward-looking} assessment of liquidation execution risk derived from current order book microstructure. The framework comprises three complementary metrics: , the cross-sectional slippage quantile; , the expected slippage in the distributional tail; and , the aggregate dollar-denominated tail slippage. We extend the base framework with a \emph{concentration adjustment} that penalizes fragile liquidity structures where a small number of market makers dominate quote provision. Drawing on recent work by Chitra et al. (2025) on autodeleveraging mechanisms and insurance fund…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRisk and Portfolio Optimization · Financial Markets and Investment Strategies · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
