AI Phenomenology for Understanding Human-AI Experiences Across Eras
Bhada Yun, Evgenia Taranova, Dana Feng, Renn Su, April Yi Wang

TL;DR
This paper advocates for AI phenomenology, a research approach focusing on first-person human experiences with AI, providing methodological tools to better understand and track human-AI alignment over time.
Contribution
It introduces AI phenomenology as a framework and offers practical methodological toolkits for capturing lived human-AI experiences across various contexts.
Findings
Developed instruments for capturing lived experiences.
Proposed design concepts for AI systems.
Outlined a research agenda for AI phenomenology.
Abstract
There is no 'ordinary' when it comes to AI. The human-AI experience is extraordinarily complex and specific to each person, yet dominant measures such as usability scales and engagement metrics flatten away nuance. We argue for AI phenomenology: a research stance that asks "How did it feel?" beyond the standard questions of "How well did it perform?" when interacting with AI systems. AI phenomenology acts as a paradigm for bidirectional human-AI alignment as it foregrounds users' first-person perceptions and interpretations of AI systems over time. We motivate AI phenomenology as a framework that captures how alignment is experienced, negotiated, and updated between users and AI systems. Tracing a lineage from Husserl through postphenomenology to Actor-Network Theory, and grounding our argument in three studies-two longitudinal studies with "Day", an AI companion, and a multi-method…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Embodied and Extended Cognition · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
