Client-Cooperative Split Learning

TL;DR

CliCooper introduces a multi-client split learning framework that enhances privacy, verifiability, and ownership protection in cooperative model training, maintaining accuracy while resisting various attacks.

Contribution

It presents novel privacy-preserving and cryptographic techniques for verifiable, trustworthy split learning in heterogeneous, partially trusted environments.

Findings

Reduces clustering attack success rate to 0%.

Decreases inversion-reconstruction similarity from 0.50 to 0.03.

Limits model extraction accuracy to about 1%.

Abstract

Model training is increasingly offered as a service for resource-constrained data owners to build customized models. Split Learning (SL) enables such services by offloading training computation under privacy constraints, and evolves toward serverless and multi-client settings where model segments are distributed across training clients. This cooperative mode assumes partial trust: data owners hide labels and data from trainer clients, while trainer clients produce verifiable training artifacts and ownership proofs. We present CliCooper, a multi-client cooperative SL framework tailored for cooperative model training services in heterogeneous and partially trusted environments, where one client contributes data, while others collectively act as SL trainers. CliCooper bridges the privacy and trust gaps through two new designs. First, differential privacy-based activation protection and secret label obfuscation safeguard data owners' privacy without degrading model performance. Second, a dynamic chained watermarking scheme cryptographically links training stages on model segments across trainers, ensuring verifiable training integrity, robust model provenance, and copyright protection. Experiments show that CliCooper preserves model accuracy while enhancing resilience to privacy and ownership attacks. It reduces the success rate of clustering attacks (which infer label groups from intermediate activation) to 0%, decreases inversion-reconstruction (which recovers training data) similarity from 0.50 to 0.03, and limits model-extraction-based surrogates to about 1% accuracy, comparable to random guessing.