Arc and Chicane Bunch Compression Schemes for Hard and Soft X-Ray Free Electron Laser Facilities: A Comparison

TL;DR

This paper compares traditional four-dipole chicane, five-dipole CSR mitigating chicane, and a new full arc compression scheme for XFELs, demonstrating improved performance and flexibility in bunch compression for soft and hard X-ray FEL facilities.

Contribution

Introduces and evaluates a novel full arc compression scheme, showing its advantages over existing chicane methods for XFEL bunch compression.

Findings

Arc and five-dipole chicanes outperform standard four-dipole chicanes in XFEL performance.

The optimal compression scheme varies with the FEL design.

Multi-FEL facilities should implement multiple compression schemes for flexibility.

Abstract

X-ray free-electron laser (XFEL) facilities require progressive compression of electron bunches as they are accelerated from an injector to the undulators. This is necessary to achieve the peak currents required for efficient lasing, without compromising transverse brightness. In the present generation of XFELs, high peak currents are achieved by means of a sequence of four-dipole bunch compression chicanes. It is well known that these systems are not ideal in that they allow projected emittance dilution at the percent level, and they exhibit amplification of microbunching, which typically must be controlled through the otherwise unwanted addition of slice energy spread by use of a laser heater. Both emittance dilution and microbunching are mediated through coherent synchrotron radiation that occurs within a bunch compression chicane. In this paper we introduce a new option for bunch compressors, that of full arc compression, and compare it to the standard four-dipole chicane and to a recently proposed variant, the five-dipole CSR mitigating chicane. It is shown that the arc compressor and the five-dipole chicane are able to give greatly improved XFEL performance compared to the standard four-dipole chicane, both in soft and hard X-ray regimes. This is demonstrated in the context of two proposed XFELs, SXL at MAX-IV, Sweden, and UK-XFEL. It is further shown that the optimal choice of compression option depends on the particular FEL scheme. This means that a simultaneous multi-FEL facility, such as UK-XFEL, must implement both arc and five-dipole methods and must be able to select between them on a bunch-by-bunch basis scheme. This means that a simultaneous multi-FEL facility, such as UK-XFEL, must implement both arc and five-dipole methods and must be able to select between them on a bunch-by-bunch basis.