From Autonomy to Sovereignty - A New Telos for Socially Assistive Technology
JiWoong Jang, Patrick Carrington, and Andrew Begel

TL;DR
This paper critiques the focus on independence in assistive technology, proposing relational sovereignty as a new goal that emphasizes users' power to choose between independence and interdependence, supported by theoretical analysis and design interventions.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of relational sovereignty as an alternative to autonomy in social assistive technology and provides a framework and interventions for operationalizing this shift.
Findings
Analysis of 90 papers reveals a focus on independence.
Relational sovereignty centers user choice and power.
Four design interventions support sovereignty-centered AT design.
Abstract
Social accessibility research faces a persistent tension: assistive technologies (AT) predominantly pursue independence, yet disabled people's experiences reveal rich preferences for interdependence. Our analysis of 90 papers from 2011-2025 uncovered that this stems from a deeper issue - which crystallized through dialogue with three bodies of theories: (1) self-determination theory (SDT), (2) symbolic interactionism, and (3) posthumanist perspectives and crip technoscience. SDT illuminates individual needs; symbolic interactionism addresses construction of social meaning and stigma; Posthumanist and crip technoscience together challenges normalcy, governance, and the human-machine boundary. Through their tensions, we identify relational sovereignty as an alternative telos - or goal - to autonomy. While our corpus equates autonomy with independence, sovereignty centers the power to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility · Innovative Human-Technology Interaction · Technology Use by Older Adults
