Step-Size Decay and Structural Stagnation in Greedy Sparse Learning
Pablo M. Bern\'a

TL;DR
This paper investigates how overly rapid decay of step sizes in greedy algorithms can cause stagnation in sparse learning, providing theoretical bounds and empirical evidence to guide better step-size choices.
Contribution
It offers a theoretical analysis of step-size decay effects in greedy sparse learning, highlighting the impact of feature coherence on convergence.
Findings
Over-decaying step sizes induce structural stagnation.
Explicit lower bounds on residual norms are derived.
Numerical experiments confirm theoretical predictions.
Abstract
Greedy algorithms are central to sparse approximation and stage-wise learning methods such as matching pursuit and boosting. It is known that the Power-Relaxed Greedy Algorithm with step sizes may fail to converge when in general Hilbert spaces. In this work, we revisit this phenomenon from a sparse learning perspective. We study realizable regression problems with controlled feature coherence and derive explicit lower bounds on the residual norm, showing that over-decaying step-size schedules induce structural stagnation even in low-dimensional sparse settings. Numerical experiments confirm the theoretical predictions and illustrate the role of feature coherence. Our results provide insight into step-size design in greedy sparse learning.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques · Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques · Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
