Comment on "On the emergence of preferred structures in quantum theory" by Soulas, Franzmann, and Di Biagio
Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica

TL;DR
This paper critiques Soulas et al.'s tensor product structure construction, demonstrating it cannot serve as an invariant, unambiguous preferred structure in quantum theory, thus confirming prior obstructions to emergence.
Contribution
It clarifies why Soulas et al.'s construction fails to produce a valid preferred structure, reinforcing the obstructions to emergence from Hamiltonian and state data alone.
Findings
Soulas et al.'s TPS cannot be both invariant and compatible with observations.
Their construction illustrates major obstructions to emergent structures.
The method serves as a pedagogical tool for quantum symmetries.
Abstract
This reply is also a friendly introduction to the impossibility of emergence of preferred structures from the Hamiltonian and the unit vector only. The obstructions to emergence are illustrated on the concrete construction of a tensor product structure (TPS) from Soulas et al., 2025 (arXiv:2512.07468v2). Soulas et al. offer their TPS as a counterexample to the proof from Stoica, 2022a (arXiv:2102.08620) that structures constructed only from and either contradict physical observations or can't describe them unambiguously. Soulas et al.'s construction of a unique TPS can't be both invariant and compatible with physical observations, so it can't be a counterexample. Its incompatibility becomes visible by examining how the relation between and the TPS, encoding the entanglement, changes in time. Therefore their TPS…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
