Optimize discrete loss with finite-difference physics constraint and time-stepping for PDE solving
Yali Luo, Yiye Zou, Heng Zhang, Mingjie Zhang, Gang Wei, Jingyu Wang, Xiaogang Deng

TL;DR
This paper introduces FDTO, a finite-difference time-stepping loss-optimization method for PDE solving that improves accuracy, stability, and memory efficiency in CFD applications by coupling coordinate transforms with structured grids.
Contribution
FDTO couples curvilinear coordinate transforms with structured grids and decomposes evolution into subproblems, advancing discrete-loss optimization for PDEs beyond PINNs.
Findings
FDTO reduces GPU memory usage by 82.6% on cavity flow.
FDTO achieves 3-5 times lower error on flow-mixing problems.
FDTO is effective for incompressible Navier-Stokes and other PDEs.
Abstract
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is an important approach for analyzing flow phenomena and predicting engineering-relevant quantities. The governing physics is formulated as partial differential equations(PDEs) and solved numerically on computational grids. Physics-informed neural networks(PINNs) have emerged as a popular optimization-based approach for solving PDEs, but they often suffer from ill-conditioned objectives and the high cost of automatic differentiation. Optimization-based discretizations such as ODIL mitigate several PINN drawbacks by optimizing discrete variables directly, yet accuracy and efficiency remain limited on body-fitted geometries and for time-dependent problems. This paper proposes FDTO, a finite-difference time-stepping loss-optimization solver that defines physics losses from discrete residuals. FDTO couples curvilinear coordinate transforms with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
