Estimating the completeness of the QUBRICS Survey with 3501 QSO redshifts from Gaia DR3 spectra
Matteo Porru, Stefano Cristiani, Francesco Guarneri, Giorgio Calderone, Andrea Grazian, Konstantina Boutsia, Andrea Trost, Valentina D'Odorico, Guido Cupani, Catarina M.J. Marques, Francesco Chiti Tegli, Fabio Fontanot

TL;DR
This study evaluates the completeness and efficiency of the QUBRICS survey's QSO selection methods using Gaia DR3 spectra, confirming high recall and providing new redshift data for over a thousand QSOs.
Contribution
It offers the first independent assessment of QUBRICS QSO selection completeness and introduces a large sample of newly characterized QSOs for future research.
Findings
QUBRICS selection methods have 89% recall for high-redshift QSOs.
Estimated completeness for spectroscopically confirmed QSOs is 82%.
Provided reliable redshifts for 1223 new QSOs, aiding future surveys.
Abstract
QSOs are essential for investigating the structure and evolution of the Universe. Historically, their identification has been concentrated in the northern hemisphere, primarily due to the sky coverage of major astronomical surveys. The QUBRICS survey, started in 2019 to address this asymmetry, has identified more than 1300 new bright (i<19.5) high-redshift (2.5<z<6) QSOs in the southern sky. We aim to quantify, using an independent QSO sample, the completeness and recall of the QUBRICS QSO selection methods, based on XGB (eXtreme Gradient Boosting) and PRF (Probabilistic Random Forest), since completeness is a fundamental metric for ensuring the statistical robustness of QSO-based cosmological investigations. A subset of Gaia DR3 sources with low-resolution spectra was analyzed, obtaining a sample of 3501 QSOs. To determine how many QSOs were correctly identified as candidates, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
