HEARTS: Benchmarking LLM Reasoning on Health Time Series
Sirui Li, Shuhan Xiao, Mihir Joshi, Ahmed Metwally, Daniel McDuff, Wei Wang, Yuzhe Yang

TL;DR
HEARTS is a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates large language models' reasoning abilities across diverse health time series data, revealing current limitations and guiding future improvements.
Contribution
The paper introduces HEARTS, a unified benchmark with 16 datasets and 110 tasks for assessing LLM reasoning over health time series, addressing existing gaps.
Findings
LLMs underperform compared to specialized models
Performance is weakly correlated with general reasoning scores
LLMs struggle with multi-step temporal reasoning and scale poorly with complexity
Abstract
The rise of large language models (LLMs) has shifted time series analysis from narrow analytics to general-purpose reasoning. Yet, existing benchmarks cover only a small set of health time series modalities and tasks, failing to reflect the diverse domains and extensive temporal dependencies inherent in real-world physiological modeling. To bridge these gaps, we introduce HEARTS (Health Reasoning over Time Series), a unified benchmark for evaluating hierarchical reasoning capabilities of LLMs over general health time series. HEARTS integrates 16 real-world datasets across 12 health domains and 20 signal modalities, and defines a comprehensive taxonomy of 110 tasks grouped into four core capabilities: Perception, Inference, Generation, and Deduction. Evaluating 14 state-of-the-art LLMs on more than 20K test samples reveals intriguing findings. First, LLMs substantially underperform…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning in Healthcare · Topic Modeling · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
