Entanglement distribution: To herald or not to herald
Jeffrey H. Shapiro, Clark Embleton, and J. Gabriel Richardson

TL;DR
This paper compares entanglement distribution rates of three spectral-island-based systems, highlighting trade-offs between heralded and unheralded approaches for quantum internet applications.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of entanglement distribution rates and equipment requirements for three islands-based SPDC systems, emphasizing the impact of heralding efficiency.
Findings
ZALM outperforms signal-path erasure at low heralding efficiencies.
Unheralded operation surpasses heralded systems when using multiple spectral islands.
Equipment complexity varies significantly between heralded and unheralded approaches.
Abstract
High-rate, high-fidelity entanglement distribution is essential for the creation of a quantum internet, and spontaneous parametric downconverters (SPDCs) are, at present, the preferred sources of entangled signal-idler photon pairs for transmission to Alice and Bob's quantum nodes. SPDCs using phase-matched spectral islands are especially attractive, in this regard, because they provide wavelength-division multiplexed signal-idler pairs with single-mode temporal behavior. This paper compares the entanglement distribution rates of three islands-based systems. Two use idler detections for heralding: islands-based zero-added-loss multiplexing (ZALM), and an islands-based Sagnac SPDC source with signal-path erasure. The third employs an unheralded Sagnac SPDC source. For 90% or lower heralding efficiencies, ZALM's per-pump-pulse entanglement distribution rate exceeds that of the signal-path…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
