Recognizing Subgraphs of Regular Tilings

TL;DR

This paper studies the complexity of recognizing subgraphs within regular tilings of spherical, Euclidean, and hyperbolic planes, providing algorithms and complexity bounds that vary across these geometries.

Contribution

It introduces algorithms and complexity results for recognizing subgraphs of regular tilings, showing polynomial, subexponential, and quasi-polynomial bounds depending on the tiling type.

Findings

Recognition is constant time for spherical tilings.

Subexponential algorithms for Euclidean tilings, with matching lower bounds under ETH.

Quasi-polynomial time recognition for hyperbolic tilings.

Abstract

For $p,q\ge2$ the $\{p,q\}$-tiling graph is the (finite or infinite) planar graph $T_{p,q}$ where all faces are cycles of length $p$ and all vertices have degree $q$. We give algorithms for the problem of recognizing (induced) subgraphs of these graphs, as follows. - For $1/p+1/q>1/2$, these graphs correspond to regular tilings of the sphere. These graphs are finite, thus recognizing their (induced) subgraphs can be done in constant time. - For $1/p+1/q=1/2$, these graphs correspond to regular tilings of the Euclidean plane. For the Euclidean square grid $T_{4,4}$ Bhatt and Cosmadakis (IPL'87) showed that recognizing subgraphs is NP-hard, even if the input graph is a tree. We show that a simple divide-and conquer algorithm achieves a subexponential running time in all Euclidean tilings, and we observe that there is an almost matching lower bound in $T_{4,4}$ under the Exponential Time Hypothesis via known reductions. - For $1/p+1/q<1/2$, these graphs correspond to regular tilings of the hyperbolic plane. As our main contribution, we show that deciding if an $n$-vertex graph is isomorphic to a subgraph of the tiling $T_{p,q}$ can be done in quasi-polynomial ($n^{O(\log n)}$) time for any fixed $q$. Our results for the hyperbolic case show that it has significantly lower complexity than the Euclidean variant, and it is unlikely to be NP-hard. The Euclidean results also suggest that the problem can be maximally hard even if the graph in question is a tree. Consequently, the known treewidth bounds for subgraphs of hyperbolic tilings do not lead to an efficient algorithm by themselves. Instead, we use convex hulls within the tiling graph, which have several desirable properties in hyperbolic tilings. Our key technical insight is that planar subgraph isomorphism can be computed via a dynamic program that builds a sphere cut decomposition of a solution subgraph's convex hull.