Implications for Type Ia Supernova Nucleosynthesis from an Experimentally Constrained $^{16}$O$(p,\alpha)^{13}$N Reaction Rate
M. Alruwaili (University of York, UK, Northern Border University, Saudi Arabia), C. Fougeres (Argonne National Laboratory, USA), A. M. Laird (University of York, UK), H. Jayatissa (Argonne National Laboratory, USA), M. L. Avila (Argonne National Laboratory, USA)

TL;DR
This study provides a new, experimentally constrained reaction rate for $^{16}$O$(p,eta)^{13}$N, showing it is about 1.5 times higher than previous estimates, which impacts supernova nucleosynthesis models and challenges previous assumptions of a sevenfold enhancement.
Contribution
The paper presents the first direct measurement of the $^{16}$O$(p,eta)^{13}$N reaction rate at astrophysical energies, reducing uncertainties and revising the enhancement factor needed in supernova models.
Findings
The new reaction rate is approximately 1.5 times higher than the REACLIB rate.
The previously suggested factor of seven enhancement is excluded.
Uncertainties in other oxygen-burning reactions remain significant.
Abstract
The ON reaction plays a key role in shaping the -particle abundance during explosive oxygen burning in Type Ia supernovae. By enhancing -production, this reaction directly affects the calcium-to-sulphur (Ca/S) and argon-to-sulphur (Ar/S) ratios, which serves as a tracer of progenitor metallicity. However, recent work suggests that the rate must be enhanced by a factor of up to seven over the standard value to explain observed Ca/S ratios across a range of progenitor metallicities. To explore this impact, available experimental cross-section data for the ON reaction have been compiled and critically evaluated. Significant discrepancies are identified in the low-energy region ( = 5.7--7.0 MeV), primarily due to limitations of the activation method. To resolve this, the first direct measurement at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNuclear physics research studies · Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
