Probing Visual Concepts in Lightweight Vision-Language Models for Automated Driving

TL;DR

This study investigates how vision-language models encode visual concepts relevant to automated driving, revealing their strengths and limitations in representing and reasoning about visual information.

Contribution

The paper introduces a method to analyze the linear encoding of visual concepts in VLMs and identifies specific failure modes affecting their performance in automated driving scenarios.

Findings

Object presence is explicitly linearly encoded in VLMs.

Spatial concepts like orientation are implicitly encoded.

Increasing object distance reduces linear separability of concepts.

Abstract

The use of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) in automated driving applications is becoming increasingly common, with the aim of leveraging their reasoning and generalisation capabilities to handle long tail scenarios. However, these models often fail on simple visual questions that are highly relevant to automated driving, and the reasons behind these failures remain poorly understood. In this work, we examine the intermediate activations of VLMs and assess the extent to which specific visual concepts are linearly encoded, with the goal of identifying bottlenecks in the flow of visual information. Specifically, we create counterfactual image sets that differ only in a targeted visual concept and then train linear probes to distinguish between them using the activations of four state-of-the-art (SOTA) VLMs. Our results show that concepts such as the presence of an object or agent in a scene are explicitly and linearly encoded, whereas other spatial visual concepts, such as the orientation of an object or agent, are only implicitly encoded by the spatial structure retained by the vision encoder. In parallel, we observe that in certain cases, even when a concept is linearly encoded in the model's activations, the model still fails to answer correctly. This leads us to identify two failure modes. The first is perceptual failure, where the visual information required to answer a question is not linearly encoded in the model's activations. The second is cognitive failure, where the visual information is present but the model fails to align it correctly with language semantics. Finally, we show that increasing the distance of the object in question quickly degrades the linear separability of the corresponding visual concept. Overall, our findings improve our understanding of failure cases in VLMs on simple visual tasks that are highly relevant to automated driving.