Classical Explanations in (and of) General Probabilistic Theories
John Harding, Alex Wilce

TL;DR
This paper introduces a formal notion of explanation between probabilistic models within a categorical framework, demonstrating that every locally-finite model admits a canonical classical explanation and representation.
Contribution
It defines a new categorical concept of explanation for probabilistic models and shows the existence of canonical classical explanations for locally-finite models.
Findings
Explanations compose via a pullback construction.
Every locally-finite probabilistic model has a canonical, sharp classical explanation.
The construction is functorial, providing a canonical classical representation.
Abstract
We introduce a notion of the ``explanation" of one (generalized) probabilistic model by another as particular kind of span in the category of probabilistic models and morphisms. We show that explanations compose under a standard pullback construction (notwithstanding that does not support arbitrary pullbacks). We then show that every locally-finite probabilistic model has a canonical, sharp classical explanation. The construction is functorial, so every locally-finite probabilistic theory has a canonical, sharp classical (though of course, usually non-local) representation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy and History of Science
