History-Deterministic B\"uchi Automata are Succinct
Antonio Casares, Aditya Prakash, K. S. Thejaswini

TL;DR
This paper presents a history-deterministic B"uchi automaton that is strictly more succinct than any equivalent deterministic B"uchi automaton, solving a longstanding open problem through theoretical and computational methods.
Contribution
It introduces the first example of a history-deterministic B"uchi automaton with fewer states than any equivalent deterministic automaton, resolving a decade-long open question.
Findings
Automaton has 65 states, demonstrating succinctness.
Proof combines theoretical insights with computational verification.
Addresses a longstanding open problem in automata theory.
Abstract
We describe a history-deterministic B\"uchi automaton that has strictly less states than every language-equivalent deterministic B\"uchi automaton. This solves a problem that had been open since the introduction of history-determinism and actively investigated for over a decade. Our example automaton has 65 states, and proving its succinctness requires the combination of theoretical insights together with the aid of computers.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Formal Methods in Verification · DNA and Biological Computing
