
TL;DR
This paper reviews the classification of finite distance-transitive graphs, highlighting that most with diameter >4 are geodesic-transitive, and explores their geometric structures and specific examples.
Contribution
It compiles known graphs, identifies the prevalence of geodesic-transitivity in large diameter cases, and extends analysis to polar Grassmann graphs.
Findings
Graphs with diameter >4 are mostly geodesic-transitive.
Examples of distance-transitive but not geodesic-transitive graphs are provided.
Explicit descriptions of geodesics in polar Grassmann graphs are given.
Abstract
We review the nearly complete classification project for finite distance-transitive graphs and compile a list of all known graphs. Interestingly, we find that those graphs with diameter larger than 4, apart from a small finite number of exceptions, are geodesic-transitive. Their geodesics exhibit a clear (often geometric) structure. On the other hand, we provide examples of graphs that are distance-transitive but not geodesic-transitive, including two infinite families with diameter 3 and a few sporadic ones with diameter 3, 4 or 7. In the last section, we extend our investigation to polar Grassmann graphs and provide an explicit description of their geodesics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
