Benchmarking Quantum Computers via Protocols, Comparing IBM's Heron vs IBM's Eagle
Nitay Mayo, Tal Mor, Yossi Weinstein

TL;DR
This paper evaluates and compares the performance of IBM's Eagle and Heron quantum processors using a protocol-based benchmarking method that assesses practical quantum advantage at the protocol level.
Contribution
It extends a protocol-based benchmarking methodology to compare different quantum architectures, providing transparent insights into their operational strengths and limitations.
Findings
Heron architecture shows substantial performance improvements over Eagle.
The benchmarking approach offers a clear assessment of quantum processors' practical capabilities.
The study demonstrates the utility of protocol-level evaluation for quantum hardware comparison.
Abstract
As quantum computing hardware rapidly advances, objectively evaluating the capabilities and error rates of new processors remains a critical challenge for the field. A clear and realistic understanding of current quantum performance is essential to guide research priorities and drive meaningful progress. In this work, we apply and extend a protocol-based benchmarking methodology (Meirom, Mor, Weinstein Arxiv 2505.12441) that utilizes well-defined quantumness thresholds. By evaluating performance at protocol level rather then the gate level, this approach provides a transparent and intuitive assessment of whether specific quantum processors, or isolated sub-chips within them, can demonstrate a practical quantum advantage. To illustrate the utility of this method, we compare two generations of IBM quantum computers: the older Eagle architecture and the newer Heron architecture. Our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
